← Documents Documentation/userspace-api/netlink/intro.rst GitHub 원문 ↗

Linux 6.18.37 · 사용자 공간 API

Netlink 입문

Netlink socket, Generic Netlink header, do·dump·multicast, ACK, 동적 family 조회와 Classic Netlink의 역사적 차이를 설명합니다.

Source pathDocumentation/userspace-api/netlink/intro.rst
Source versionLinux v6.18.37
TranslationDUJINLABS 전문 번역 + 해설

요약·해설과 원문, 전문 번역을 서로 분리했습니다. API 이름, symbol, source path는 원문 표기를 사용합니다.

1. 요약·해설

원문의 핵심 논리와 kernel programming 관점의 보충 설명입니다. 아래의 전문 번역과는 별도로 작성했습니다.

2. 영어 원문 전체

번역 기준이 된 Linux v6.18.37 원문입니다. 줄 번호는 이 버전의 파일 좌표입니다.

원문 전체 펼치기
1 .. SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
2
3 =======================
4 Introduction to Netlink
5 =======================
6
7 Netlink is often described as an ioctl() replacement.
8 It aims to replace fixed-format C structures as supplied
9 to ioctl() with a format which allows an easy way to add
10 or extended the arguments.
11
12 To achieve this Netlink uses a minimal fixed-format metadata header
13 followed by multiple attributes in the TLV (type, length, value) format.
14
15 Unfortunately the protocol has evolved over the years, in an organic
16 and undocumented fashion, making it hard to coherently explain.
17 To make the most practical sense this document starts by describing
18 netlink as it is used today and dives into more "historical" uses
19 in later sections.
20
21 Opening a socket
22 ================
23
24 Netlink communication happens over sockets, a socket needs to be
25 opened first:
26
27 .. code-block:: c
28
29 fd = socket(AF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW, NETLINK_GENERIC);
30
31 The use of sockets allows for a natural way of exchanging information
32 in both directions (to and from the kernel). The operations are still
33 performed synchronously when applications send() the request but
34 a separate recv() system call is needed to read the reply.
35
36 A very simplified flow of a Netlink "call" will therefore look
37 something like:
38
39 .. code-block:: c
40
41 fd = socket(AF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW, NETLINK_GENERIC);
42
43 /* format the request */
44 send(fd, &request, sizeof(request));
45 n = recv(fd, &response, RSP_BUFFER_SIZE);
46 /* interpret the response */
47
48 Netlink also provides natural support for "dumping", i.e. communicating
49 to user space all objects of a certain type (e.g. dumping all network
50 interfaces).
51
52 .. code-block:: c
53
54 fd = socket(AF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW, NETLINK_GENERIC);
55
56 /* format the dump request */
57 send(fd, &request, sizeof(request));
58 while (1) {
59 n = recv(fd, &buffer, RSP_BUFFER_SIZE);
60 /* one recv() call can read multiple messages, hence the loop below */
61 for (nl_msg in buffer) {
62 if (nl_msg.nlmsg_type == NLMSG_DONE)
63 goto dump_finished;
64 /* process the object */
65 }
66 }
67 dump_finished:
68
69 The first two arguments of the socket() call require little explanation -
70 it is opening a Netlink socket, with all headers provided by the user
71 (hence NETLINK, RAW). The last argument is the protocol within Netlink.
72 This field used to identify the subsystem with which the socket will
73 communicate.
74
75 Classic vs Generic Netlink
76 --------------------------
77
78 Initial implementation of Netlink depended on a static allocation
79 of IDs to subsystems and provided little supporting infrastructure.
80 Let us refer to those protocols collectively as **Classic Netlink**.
81 The list of them is defined on top of the ``include/uapi/linux/netlink.h``
82 file, they include among others - general networking (NETLINK_ROUTE),
83 iSCSI (NETLINK_ISCSI), and audit (NETLINK_AUDIT).
84
85 **Generic Netlink** (introduced in 2005) allows for dynamic registration of
86 subsystems (and subsystem ID allocation), introspection and simplifies
87 implementing the kernel side of the interface.
88
89 The following section describes how to use Generic Netlink, as the
90 number of subsystems using Generic Netlink outnumbers the older
91 protocols by an order of magnitude. There are also no plans for adding
92 more Classic Netlink protocols to the kernel.
93 Basic information on how communicating with core networking parts of
94 the Linux kernel (or another of the 20 subsystems using Classic
95 Netlink) differs from Generic Netlink is provided later in this document.
96
97 Generic Netlink
98 ===============
99
100 In addition to the Netlink fixed metadata header each Netlink protocol
101 defines its own fixed metadata header. (Similarly to how network
102 headers stack - Ethernet > IP > TCP we have Netlink > Generic N. > Family.)
103
104 A Netlink message always starts with struct nlmsghdr, which is followed
105 by a protocol-specific header. In case of Generic Netlink the protocol
106 header is struct genlmsghdr.
107
108 The practical meaning of the fields in case of Generic Netlink is as follows:
109
110 .. code-block:: c
111
112 struct nlmsghdr {
113 __u32 nlmsg_len; /* Length of message including headers */
114 __u16 nlmsg_type; /* Generic Netlink Family (subsystem) ID */
115 __u16 nlmsg_flags; /* Flags - request or dump */
116 __u32 nlmsg_seq; /* Sequence number */
117 __u32 nlmsg_pid; /* Port ID, set to 0 */
118 };
119 struct genlmsghdr {
120 __u8 cmd; /* Command, as defined by the Family */
121 __u8 version; /* Irrelevant, set to 1 */
122 __u16 reserved; /* Reserved, set to 0 */
123 };
124 /* TLV attributes follow... */
125
126 In Classic Netlink :c:member:`nlmsghdr.nlmsg_type` used to identify
127 which operation within the subsystem the message was referring to
128 (e.g. get information about a netdev). Generic Netlink needs to mux
129 multiple subsystems in a single protocol so it uses this field to
130 identify the subsystem, and :c:member:`genlmsghdr.cmd` identifies
131 the operation instead. (See :ref:`res_fam` for
132 information on how to find the Family ID of the subsystem of interest.)
133 Note that the first 16 values (0 - 15) of this field are reserved for
134 control messages both in Classic Netlink and Generic Netlink.
135 See :ref:`nl_msg_type` for more details.
136
137 There are 3 usual types of message exchanges on a Netlink socket:
138
139 - performing a single action (``do``);
140 - dumping information (``dump``);
141 - getting asynchronous notifications (``multicast``).
142
143 Classic Netlink is very flexible and presumably allows other types
144 of exchanges to happen, but in practice those are the three that get
145 used.
146
147 Asynchronous notifications are sent by the kernel and received by
148 the user sockets which subscribed to them. ``do`` and ``dump`` requests
149 are initiated by the user. :c:member:`nlmsghdr.nlmsg_flags` should
150 be set as follows:
151
152 - for ``do``: ``NLM_F_REQUEST | NLM_F_ACK``
153 - for ``dump``: ``NLM_F_REQUEST | NLM_F_ACK | NLM_F_DUMP``
154
155 :c:member:`nlmsghdr.nlmsg_seq` should be a set to a monotonically
156 increasing value. The value gets echoed back in responses and doesn't
157 matter in practice, but setting it to an increasing value for each
158 message sent is considered good hygiene. The purpose of the field is
159 matching responses to requests. Asynchronous notifications will have
160 :c:member:`nlmsghdr.nlmsg_seq` of ``0``.
161
162 :c:member:`nlmsghdr.nlmsg_pid` is the Netlink equivalent of an address.
163 This field can be set to ``0`` when talking to the kernel.
164 See :ref:`nlmsg_pid` for the (uncommon) uses of the field.
165
166 The expected use for :c:member:`genlmsghdr.version` was to allow
167 versioning of the APIs provided by the subsystems. No subsystem to
168 date made significant use of this field, so setting it to ``1`` seems
169 like a safe bet.
170
171 .. _nl_msg_type:
172
173 Netlink message types
174 ---------------------
175
176 As previously mentioned :c:member:`nlmsghdr.nlmsg_type` carries
177 protocol specific values but the first 16 identifiers are reserved
178 (first subsystem specific message type should be equal to
179 ``NLMSG_MIN_TYPE`` which is ``0x10``).
180
181 There are only 4 Netlink control messages defined:
182
183 - ``NLMSG_NOOP`` - ignore the message, not used in practice;
184 - ``NLMSG_ERROR`` - carries the return code of an operation;
185 - ``NLMSG_DONE`` - marks the end of a dump;
186 - ``NLMSG_OVERRUN`` - socket buffer has overflown, not used to date.
187
188 ``NLMSG_ERROR`` and ``NLMSG_DONE`` are of practical importance.
189 They carry return codes for operations. Note that unless
190 the ``NLM_F_ACK`` flag is set on the request Netlink will not respond
191 with ``NLMSG_ERROR`` if there is no error. To avoid having to special-case
192 this quirk it is recommended to always set ``NLM_F_ACK``.
193
194 The format of ``NLMSG_ERROR`` is described by struct nlmsgerr::
195
196 ----------------------------------------------
197 | struct nlmsghdr - response header |
198 ----------------------------------------------
199 | int error |
200 ----------------------------------------------
201 | struct nlmsghdr - original request header |
202 ----------------------------------------------
203 | ** optionally (1) payload of the request |
204 ----------------------------------------------
205 | ** optionally (2) extended ACK |
206 ----------------------------------------------
207
208 There are two instances of struct nlmsghdr here, first of the response
209 and second of the request. ``NLMSG_ERROR`` carries the information about
210 the request which led to the error. This could be useful when trying
211 to match requests to responses or re-parse the request to dump it into
212 logs.
213
214 The payload of the request is not echoed in messages reporting success
215 (``error == 0``) or if ``NETLINK_CAP_ACK`` setsockopt() was set.
216 The latter is common
217 and perhaps recommended as having to read a copy of every request back
218 from the kernel is rather wasteful. The absence of request payload
219 is indicated by ``NLM_F_CAPPED`` in :c:member:`nlmsghdr.nlmsg_flags`.
220
221 The second optional element of ``NLMSG_ERROR`` are the extended ACK
222 attributes. See :ref:`ext_ack` for more details. The presence
223 of extended ACK is indicated by ``NLM_F_ACK_TLVS`` in
224 :c:member:`nlmsghdr.nlmsg_flags`.
225
226 ``NLMSG_DONE`` is simpler, the request is never echoed but the extended
227 ACK attributes may be present::
228
229 ----------------------------------------------
230 | struct nlmsghdr - response header |
231 ----------------------------------------------
232 | int error |
233 ----------------------------------------------
234 | ** optionally extended ACK |
235 ----------------------------------------------
236
237 Note that some implementations may issue custom ``NLMSG_DONE`` messages
238 in reply to ``do`` action requests. In that case the payload is
239 implementation-specific and may also be absent.
240
241 .. _res_fam:
242
243 Resolving the Family ID
244 -----------------------
245
246 This section explains how to find the Family ID of a subsystem.
247 It also serves as an example of Generic Netlink communication.
248
249 Generic Netlink is itself a subsystem exposed via the Generic Netlink API.
250 To avoid a circular dependency Generic Netlink has a statically allocated
251 Family ID (``GENL_ID_CTRL`` which is equal to ``NLMSG_MIN_TYPE``).
252 The Generic Netlink family implements a command used to find out information
253 about other families (``CTRL_CMD_GETFAMILY``).
254
255 To get information about the Generic Netlink family named for example
256 ``"test1"`` we need to send a message on the previously opened Generic Netlink
257 socket. The message should target the Generic Netlink Family (1), be a
258 ``do`` (2) call to ``CTRL_CMD_GETFAMILY`` (3). A ``dump`` version of this
259 call would make the kernel respond with information about *all* the families
260 it knows about. Last but not least the name of the family in question has
261 to be specified (4) as an attribute with the appropriate type::
262
263 struct nlmsghdr:
264 __u32 nlmsg_len: 32
265 __u16 nlmsg_type: GENL_ID_CTRL // (1)
266 __u16 nlmsg_flags: NLM_F_REQUEST | NLM_F_ACK // (2)
267 __u32 nlmsg_seq: 1
268 __u32 nlmsg_pid: 0
269
270 struct genlmsghdr:
271 __u8 cmd: CTRL_CMD_GETFAMILY // (3)
272 __u8 version: 2 /* or 1, doesn't matter */
273 __u16 reserved: 0
274
275 struct nlattr: // (4)
276 __u16 nla_len: 10
277 __u16 nla_type: CTRL_ATTR_FAMILY_NAME
278 char data: test1\0
279
280 (padding:)
281 char data: \0\0
282
283 The length fields in Netlink (:c:member:`nlmsghdr.nlmsg_len`
284 and :c:member:`nlattr.nla_len`) always *include* the header.
285 Attribute headers in netlink must be aligned to 4 bytes from the start
286 of the message, hence the extra ``\0\0`` after ``CTRL_ATTR_FAMILY_NAME``.
287 The attribute lengths *exclude* the padding.
288
289 If the family is found kernel will reply with two messages, the response
290 with all the information about the family::
291
292 /* Message #1 - reply */
293 struct nlmsghdr:
294 __u32 nlmsg_len: 136
295 __u16 nlmsg_type: GENL_ID_CTRL
296 __u16 nlmsg_flags: 0
297 __u32 nlmsg_seq: 1 /* echoed from our request */
298 __u32 nlmsg_pid: 5831 /* The PID of our user space process */
299
300 struct genlmsghdr:
301 __u8 cmd: CTRL_CMD_GETFAMILY
302 __u8 version: 2
303 __u16 reserved: 0
304
305 struct nlattr:
306 __u16 nla_len: 10
307 __u16 nla_type: CTRL_ATTR_FAMILY_NAME
308 char data: test1\0
309
310 (padding:)
311 data: \0\0
312
313 struct nlattr:
314 __u16 nla_len: 6
315 __u16 nla_type: CTRL_ATTR_FAMILY_ID
316 __u16: 123 /* The Family ID we are after */
317
318 (padding:)
319 char data: \0\0
320
321 struct nlattr:
322 __u16 nla_len: 9
323 __u16 nla_type: CTRL_ATTR_FAMILY_VERSION
324 __u16: 1
325
326 /* ... etc, more attributes will follow. */
327
328 And the error code (success) since ``NLM_F_ACK`` had been set on the request::
329
330 /* Message #2 - the ACK */
331 struct nlmsghdr:
332 __u32 nlmsg_len: 36
333 __u16 nlmsg_type: NLMSG_ERROR
334 __u16 nlmsg_flags: NLM_F_CAPPED /* There won't be a payload */
335 __u32 nlmsg_seq: 1 /* echoed from our request */
336 __u32 nlmsg_pid: 5831 /* The PID of our user space process */
337
338 int error: 0
339
340 struct nlmsghdr: /* Copy of the request header as we sent it */
341 __u32 nlmsg_len: 32
342 __u16 nlmsg_type: GENL_ID_CTRL
343 __u16 nlmsg_flags: NLM_F_REQUEST | NLM_F_ACK
344 __u32 nlmsg_seq: 1
345 __u32 nlmsg_pid: 0
346
347 The order of attributes (struct nlattr) is not guaranteed so the user
348 has to walk the attributes and parse them.
349
350 Note that Generic Netlink sockets are not associated or bound to a single
351 family. A socket can be used to exchange messages with many different
352 families, selecting the recipient family on message-by-message basis using
353 the :c:member:`nlmsghdr.nlmsg_type` field.
354
355 .. _ext_ack:
356
357 Extended ACK
358 ------------
359
360 Extended ACK controls reporting of additional error/warning TLVs
361 in ``NLMSG_ERROR`` and ``NLMSG_DONE`` messages. To maintain backward
362 compatibility this feature has to be explicitly enabled by setting
363 the ``NETLINK_EXT_ACK`` setsockopt() to ``1``.
364
365 Types of extended ack attributes are defined in enum nlmsgerr_attrs.
366 The most commonly used attributes are ``NLMSGERR_ATTR_MSG``,
367 ``NLMSGERR_ATTR_OFFS`` and ``NLMSGERR_ATTR_MISS_*``.
368
369 ``NLMSGERR_ATTR_MSG`` carries a message in English describing
370 the encountered problem. These messages are far more detailed
371 than what can be expressed thru standard UNIX error codes.
372
373 ``NLMSGERR_ATTR_OFFS`` points to the attribute which caused the problem.
374
375 ``NLMSGERR_ATTR_MISS_TYPE`` and ``NLMSGERR_ATTR_MISS_NEST``
376 inform about a missing attribute.
377
378 Extended ACKs can be reported on errors as well as in case of success.
379 The latter should be treated as a warning.
380
381 Extended ACKs greatly improve the usability of Netlink and should
382 always be enabled, appropriately parsed and reported to the user.
383
384 Advanced topics
385 ===============
386
387 Dump consistency
388 ----------------
389
390 Some of the data structures kernel uses for storing objects make
391 it hard to provide an atomic snapshot of all the objects in a dump
392 (without impacting the fast-paths updating them).
393
394 Kernel may set the ``NLM_F_DUMP_INTR`` flag on any message in a dump
395 (including the ``NLMSG_DONE`` message) if the dump was interrupted and
396 may be inconsistent (e.g. missing objects). User space should retry
397 the dump if it sees the flag set.
398
399 Introspection
400 -------------
401
402 The basic introspection abilities are enabled by access to the Family
403 object as reported in :ref:`res_fam`. User can query information about
404 the Generic Netlink family, including which operations are supported
405 by the kernel and what attributes the kernel understands.
406 Family information includes the highest ID of an attribute kernel can parse,
407 a separate command (``CTRL_CMD_GETPOLICY``) provides detailed information
408 about supported attributes, including ranges of values the kernel accepts.
409
410 Querying family information is useful in cases when user space needs
411 to make sure that the kernel has support for a feature before issuing
412 a request.
413
414 .. _nlmsg_pid:
415
416 nlmsg_pid
417 ---------
418
419 :c:member:`nlmsghdr.nlmsg_pid` is the Netlink equivalent of an address.
420 It is referred to as Port ID, sometimes Process ID because for historical
421 reasons if the application does not select (bind() to) an explicit Port ID
422 kernel will automatically assign it the ID equal to its Process ID
423 (as reported by the getpid() system call).
424
425 Similarly to the bind() semantics of the TCP/IP network protocols the value
426 of zero means "assign automatically", hence it is common for applications
427 to leave the :c:member:`nlmsghdr.nlmsg_pid` field initialized to ``0``.
428
429 The field is still used today in rare cases when kernel needs to send
430 a unicast notification. User space application can use bind() to associate
431 its socket with a specific PID, it then communicates its PID to the kernel.
432 This way the kernel can reach the specific user space process.
433
434 This sort of communication is utilized in UMH (User Mode Helper)-like
435 scenarios when kernel needs to trigger user space processing or ask user
436 space for a policy decision.
437
438 Multicast notifications
439 -----------------------
440
441 One of the strengths of Netlink is the ability to send event notifications
442 to user space. This is a unidirectional form of communication (kernel ->
443 user) and does not involve any control messages like ``NLMSG_ERROR`` or
444 ``NLMSG_DONE``.
445
446 For example the Generic Netlink family itself defines a set of multicast
447 notifications about registered families. When a new family is added the
448 sockets subscribed to the notifications will get the following message::
449
450 struct nlmsghdr:
451 __u32 nlmsg_len: 136
452 __u16 nlmsg_type: GENL_ID_CTRL
453 __u16 nlmsg_flags: 0
454 __u32 nlmsg_seq: 0
455 __u32 nlmsg_pid: 0
456
457 struct genlmsghdr:
458 __u8 cmd: CTRL_CMD_NEWFAMILY
459 __u8 version: 2
460 __u16 reserved: 0
461
462 struct nlattr:
463 __u16 nla_len: 10
464 __u16 nla_type: CTRL_ATTR_FAMILY_NAME
465 char data: test1\0
466
467 (padding:)
468 data: \0\0
469
470 struct nlattr:
471 __u16 nla_len: 6
472 __u16 nla_type: CTRL_ATTR_FAMILY_ID
473 __u16: 123 /* The Family ID we are after */
474
475 (padding:)
476 char data: \0\0
477
478 struct nlattr:
479 __u16 nla_len: 9
480 __u16 nla_type: CTRL_ATTR_FAMILY_VERSION
481 __u16: 1
482
483 /* ... etc, more attributes will follow. */
484
485 The notification contains the same information as the response
486 to the ``CTRL_CMD_GETFAMILY`` request.
487
488 The Netlink headers of the notification are mostly 0 and irrelevant.
489 The :c:member:`nlmsghdr.nlmsg_seq` may be either zero or a monotonically
490 increasing notification sequence number maintained by the family.
491
492 To receive notifications the user socket must subscribe to the relevant
493 notification group. Much like the Family ID, the Group ID for a given
494 multicast group is dynamic and can be found inside the Family information.
495 The ``CTRL_ATTR_MCAST_GROUPS`` attribute contains nests with names
496 (``CTRL_ATTR_MCAST_GRP_NAME``) and IDs (``CTRL_ATTR_MCAST_GRP_ID``) of
497 the groups family.
498
499 Once the Group ID is known a setsockopt() call adds the socket to the group:
500
501 .. code-block:: c
502
503 unsigned int group_id;
504
505 /* .. find the group ID... */
506
507 setsockopt(fd, SOL_NETLINK, NETLINK_ADD_MEMBERSHIP,
508 &group_id, sizeof(group_id));
509
510 The socket will now receive notifications.
511
512 It is recommended to use separate sockets for receiving notifications
513 and sending requests to the kernel. The asynchronous nature of notifications
514 means that they may get mixed in with the responses making the message
515 handling much harder.
516
517 Buffer sizing
518 -------------
519
520 Netlink sockets are datagram sockets rather than stream sockets,
521 meaning that each message must be received in its entirety by a single
522 recv()/recvmsg() system call. If the buffer provided by the user is too
523 short, the message will be truncated and the ``MSG_TRUNC`` flag set
524 in struct msghdr (struct msghdr is the second argument
525 of the recvmsg() system call, *not* a Netlink header).
526
527 Upon truncation the remaining part of the message is discarded.
528
529 Netlink expects that the user buffer will be at least 8kB or a page
530 size of the CPU architecture, whichever is bigger. Particular Netlink
531 families may, however, require a larger buffer. 32kB buffer is recommended
532 for most efficient handling of dumps (larger buffer fits more dumped
533 objects and therefore fewer recvmsg() calls are needed).
534
535 .. _classic_netlink:
536
537 Classic Netlink
538 ===============
539
540 The main differences between Classic and Generic Netlink are the dynamic
541 allocation of subsystem identifiers and availability of introspection.
542 In theory the protocol does not differ significantly, however, in practice
543 Classic Netlink experimented with concepts which were abandoned in Generic
544 Netlink (really, they usually only found use in a small corner of a single
545 subsystem). This section is meant as an explainer of a few of such concepts,
546 with the explicit goal of giving the Generic Netlink
547 users the confidence to ignore them when reading the uAPI headers.
548
549 Most of the concepts and examples here refer to the ``NETLINK_ROUTE`` family,
550 which covers much of the configuration of the Linux networking stack.
551 Real documentation of that family, deserves a chapter (or a book) of its own.
552
553 Families
554 --------
555
556 Netlink refers to subsystems as families. This is a remnant of using
557 sockets and the concept of protocol families, which are part of message
558 demultiplexing in ``NETLINK_ROUTE``.
559
560 Sadly every layer of encapsulation likes to refer to whatever it's carrying
561 as "families" making the term very confusing:
562
563 1. AF_NETLINK is a bona fide socket protocol family
564 2. AF_NETLINK's documentation refers to what comes after its own
565 header (struct nlmsghdr) in a message as a "Family Header"
566 3. Generic Netlink is a family for AF_NETLINK (struct genlmsghdr follows
567 struct nlmsghdr), yet it also calls its users "Families".
568
569 Note that the Generic Netlink Family IDs are in a different "ID space"
570 and overlap with Classic Netlink protocol numbers (e.g. ``NETLINK_CRYPTO``
571 has the Classic Netlink protocol ID of 21 which Generic Netlink will
572 happily allocate to one of its families as well).
573
574 Strict checking
575 ---------------
576
577 The ``NETLINK_GET_STRICT_CHK`` socket option enables strict input checking
578 in ``NETLINK_ROUTE``. It was needed because historically kernel did not
579 validate the fields of structures it didn't process. This made it impossible
580 to start using those fields later without risking regressions in applications
581 which initialized them incorrectly or not at all.
582
583 ``NETLINK_GET_STRICT_CHK`` declares that the application is initializing
584 all fields correctly. It also opts into validating that message does not
585 contain trailing data and requests that kernel rejects attributes with
586 type higher than largest attribute type known to the kernel.
587
588 ``NETLINK_GET_STRICT_CHK`` is not used outside of ``NETLINK_ROUTE``.
589
590 Unknown attributes
591 ------------------
592
593 Historically Netlink ignored all unknown attributes. The thinking was that
594 it would free the application from having to probe what kernel supports.
595 The application could make a request to change the state and check which
596 parts of the request "stuck".
597
598 This is no longer the case for new Generic Netlink families and those opting
599 in to strict checking. See enum netlink_validation for validation types
600 performed.
601
602 Fixed metadata and structures
603 -----------------------------
604
605 Classic Netlink made liberal use of fixed-format structures within
606 the messages. Messages would commonly have a structure with
607 a considerable number of fields after struct nlmsghdr. It was also
608 common to put structures with multiple members inside attributes,
609 without breaking each member into an attribute of its own.
610
611 This has caused problems with validation and extensibility and
612 therefore using binary structures is actively discouraged for new
613 attributes.
614
615 Request types
616 -------------
617
618 ``NETLINK_ROUTE`` categorized requests into 4 types ``NEW``, ``DEL``, ``GET``,
619 and ``SET``. Each object can handle all or some of those requests
620 (objects being netdevs, routes, addresses, qdiscs etc.) Request type
621 is defined by the 2 lowest bits of the message type, so commands for
622 new objects would always be allocated with a stride of 4.
623
624 Each object would also have its own fixed metadata shared by all request
625 types (e.g. struct ifinfomsg for netdev requests, struct ifaddrmsg for address
626 requests, struct tcmsg for qdisc requests).
627
628 Even though other protocols and Generic Netlink commands often use
629 the same verbs in their message names (``GET``, ``SET``) the concept
630 of request types did not find wider adoption.
631
632 Notification echo
633 -----------------
634
635 ``NLM_F_ECHO`` requests for notifications resulting from the request
636 to be queued onto the requesting socket. This is useful to discover
637 the impact of the request.
638
639 Note that this feature is not universally implemented.
640
641 Other request-type-specific flags
642 ---------------------------------
643
644 Classic Netlink defined various flags for its ``GET``, ``NEW``
645 and ``DEL`` requests in the upper byte of nlmsg_flags in struct nlmsghdr.
646 Since request types have not been generalized the request type specific
647 flags are rarely used (and considered deprecated for new families).
648
649 For ``GET`` - ``NLM_F_ROOT`` and ``NLM_F_MATCH`` are combined into
650 ``NLM_F_DUMP``, and not used separately. ``NLM_F_ATOMIC`` is never used.
651
652 For ``DEL`` - ``NLM_F_NONREC`` is only used by nftables and ``NLM_F_BULK``
653 only by FDB some operations.
654
655 The flags for ``NEW`` are used most commonly in classic Netlink. Unfortunately,
656 the meaning is not crystal clear. The following description is based on the
657 best guess of the intention of the authors, and in practice all families
658 stray from it in one way or another. ``NLM_F_REPLACE`` asks to replace
659 an existing object, if no matching object exists the operation should fail.
660 ``NLM_F_EXCL`` has the opposite semantics and only succeeds if object already
661 existed.
662 ``NLM_F_CREATE`` asks for the object to be created if it does not
663 exist, it can be combined with ``NLM_F_REPLACE`` and ``NLM_F_EXCL``.
664
665 A comment in the main Netlink uAPI header states::
666
667 4.4BSD ADD NLM_F_CREATE|NLM_F_EXCL
668 4.4BSD CHANGE NLM_F_REPLACE
669
670 True CHANGE NLM_F_CREATE|NLM_F_REPLACE
671 Append NLM_F_CREATE
672 Check NLM_F_EXCL
673
674 which seems to indicate that those flags predate request types.
675 ``NLM_F_REPLACE`` without ``NLM_F_CREATE`` was initially used instead
676 of ``SET`` commands.
677 ``NLM_F_EXCL`` without ``NLM_F_CREATE`` was used to check if object exists
678 without creating it, presumably predating ``GET`` commands.
679
680 ``NLM_F_APPEND`` indicates that if one key can have multiple objects associated
681 with it (e.g. multiple next-hop objects for a route) the new object should be
682 added to the list rather than replacing the entire list.
683
684 uAPI reference
685 ==============
686
687 .. kernel-doc:: include/uapi/linux/netlink.h
688

3. 한국어 전문 번역

영어 원문의 문단 순서와 의미를 유지한 전체 번역입니다. 코드, 함수명, symbol과 URL은 원문 표기를 유지합니다.

Classic Netlink와 family 용어

535-573

Classic과 Generic의 핵심 차이는 subsystem ID 동적 할당과 introspection입니다. 이론상 protocol 차이는 크지 않지만 Classic은 Generic에서 버린 여러 실험적 개념을 사용했습니다. 이 구간은 Generic 사용자들이 uAPI header를 읽을 때 그런 개념을 안전하게 무시할 수 있도록 배경을 제공합니다.

예시는 Linux networking stack 설정의 큰 부분을 담당하는 `NETLINK_ROUTE`를 중심으로 합니다. 이 family의 실제 사용법은 별도 장이나 책이 필요할 만큼 방대합니다.

family라는 말의 세 층
family의 의미
1`AF_NETLINK` 자체가 socket protocol family
2`nlmsghdr` 뒤의 protocol별 header를 Family Header라고 부름
3Generic Netlink가 AF_NETLINK family이면서 자신의 사용 subsystem도 Family라고 부름

encapsulation마다 같은 용어를 재사용해 혼란이 생깁니다.

Generic Netlink family ID는 Classic protocol 번호와 다른 ID 공간입니다. 따라서 Classic `NETLINK_CRYPTO` protocol ID 21과 같은 숫자를 Generic Netlink가 어느 family에 할당해도 충돌하지 않습니다.

.. _classic_netlink:

Classic Netlink
===============

The main differences between Classic and Generic Netlink are the dynamic
allocation of subsystem identifiers and availability of introspection.
In theory the protocol does not differ significantly, however, in practice
Classic Netlink experimented with concepts which were abandoned in Generic
Netlink (really, they usually only found use in a small corner of a single
subsystem). This section is meant as an explainer of a few of such concepts,
with the explicit goal of giving the Generic Netlink
users the confidence to ignore them when reading the uAPI headers.

Most of the concepts and examples here refer to the ``NETLINK_ROUTE`` family,
which covers much of the configuration of the Linux networking stack.
Real documentation of that family, deserves a chapter (or a book) of its own.

Families
--------

Netlink refers to subsystems as families. This is a remnant of using
sockets and the concept of protocol families, which are part of message
demultiplexing in ``NETLINK_ROUTE``.

Sadly every layer of encapsulation likes to refer to whatever it's carrying
as "families" making the term very confusing:

 1. AF_NETLINK is a bona fide socket protocol family
 2. AF_NETLINK's documentation refers to what comes after its own
    header (struct nlmsghdr) in a message as a "Family Header"
 3. Generic Netlink is a family for AF_NETLINK (struct genlmsghdr follows
    struct nlmsghdr), yet it also calls its users "Families".

Note that the Generic Netlink Family IDs are in a different "ID space"
and overlap with Classic Netlink protocol numbers (e.g. ``NETLINK_CRYPTO``
has the Classic Netlink protocol ID of 21 which Generic Netlink will
happily allocate to one of its families as well).

strict checking과 알 수 없는 attribute

574-601

`NETLINK_GET_STRICT_CHK` socket option은 `NETLINK_ROUTE`의 엄격한 입력 검사를 켭니다. 과거 kernel은 자신이 처리하지 않는 구조체 필드를 검증하지 않았고, 애플리케이션이 그 필드를 잘못 초기화하거나 전혀 초기화하지 않았을 수 있어 나중에 필드를 사용하는 것이 회귀 위험이 되었습니다.

NETLINK_GET_STRICT_CHK 약속
효과설명
필드 초기화애플리케이션이 모든 필드를 올바르게 초기화한다고 선언
trailing datamessage 끝의 불필요한 데이터 거부
attribute typekernel이 아는 최대 type보다 큰 attribute 거부 요청
적용 범위`NETLINK_ROUTE` 밖에서는 사용하지 않음

애플리케이션과 kernel 양쪽의 검증 기대를 강화합니다.

역사적으로 Netlink는 알 수 없는 attribute를 모두 무시했습니다. 애플리케이션이 kernel 지원 여부를 미리 탐지하지 않고 상태 변경을 요청한 뒤 실제 반영된 부분을 확인하게 하려는 발상이었습니다.

새 Generic Netlink family와 strict checking을 선택한 family에서는 더 이상 그렇지 않습니다. 수행되는 검증 종류는 `enum netlink_validation`을 참조합니다.

Strict checking
---------------

The ``NETLINK_GET_STRICT_CHK`` socket option enables strict input checking
in ``NETLINK_ROUTE``. It was needed because historically kernel did not
validate the fields of structures it didn't process. This made it impossible
to start using those fields later without risking regressions in applications
which initialized them incorrectly or not at all.

``NETLINK_GET_STRICT_CHK`` declares that the application is initializing
all fields correctly. It also opts into validating that message does not
contain trailing data and requests that kernel rejects attributes with
type higher than largest attribute type known to the kernel.

``NETLINK_GET_STRICT_CHK`` is not used outside of ``NETLINK_ROUTE``.

Unknown attributes
------------------

Historically Netlink ignored all unknown attributes. The thinking was that
it would free the application from having to probe what kernel supports.
The application could make a request to change the state and check which
parts of the request "stuck".

This is no longer the case for new Generic Netlink families and those opting
in to strict checking. See enum netlink_validation for validation types
performed.

고정 구조체와 NETLINK_ROUTE request type

602-631

Classic Netlink message는 `nlmsghdr` 뒤에 필드가 많은 고정 구조체를 자주 두었고, attribute 안에도 각 member를 별도 attribute로 나누지 않은 다중 member 구조체를 넣었습니다. 이는 검증과 확장을 어렵게 했기 때문에 새 attribute에서 binary 구조체를 사용하는 것은 적극적으로 권장되지 않습니다.

`NETLINK_ROUTE`는 request를 `NEW`, `DEL`, `GET`, `SET` 네 종류로 분류합니다. netdev, route, address, qdisc 같은 각 객체는 일부 또는 전부를 처리할 수 있습니다. request type은 message type의 가장 낮은 2비트로 정의되어 새 객체 command가 4 간격으로 할당됩니다.

NETLINK_ROUTE 객체별 고정 metadata
객체구조체
netdev`struct ifinfomsg`
address`struct ifaddrmsg`
qdisc`struct tcmsg`

모든 request type이 객체 종류별 구조체를 공유합니다.

다른 protocol과 Generic Netlink command 이름에도 `GET`, `SET` 같은 동사가 자주 나타나지만, 이 request type 체계 자체는 널리 채택되지 않았습니다.

Fixed metadata and structures
-----------------------------

Classic Netlink made liberal use of fixed-format structures within
the messages. Messages would commonly have a structure with
a considerable number of fields after struct nlmsghdr. It was also
common to put structures with multiple members inside attributes,
without breaking each member into an attribute of its own.

This has caused problems with validation and extensibility and
therefore using binary structures is actively discouraged for new
attributes.

Request types
-------------

``NETLINK_ROUTE`` categorized requests into 4 types ``NEW``, ``DEL``, ``GET``,
and ``SET``. Each object can handle all or some of those requests
(objects being netdevs, routes, addresses, qdiscs etc.) Request type
is defined by the 2 lowest bits of the message type, so commands for
new objects would always be allocated with a stride of 4.

Each object would also have its own fixed metadata shared by all request
types (e.g. struct ifinfomsg for netdev requests, struct ifaddrmsg for address
requests, struct tcmsg for qdisc requests).

Even though other protocols and Generic Netlink commands often use
the same verbs in their message names (``GET``, ``SET``) the concept
of request types did not find wider adoption.

notification echo와 request별 flags

632-683

`NLM_F_ECHO`는 요청 결과로 발생한 notification을 요청 socket에도 queue하도록 요구합니다. 요청이 실제로 만든 영향을 확인하는 데 유용하지만 모든 family가 구현하지는 않습니다.

Classic Netlink는 `nlmsg_flags` 상위 byte에 `GET`, `NEW`, `DEL`별 flag를 정의했습니다. request type이 일반화되지 않았기 때문에 이 flags는 드물게 쓰이며 새 family에서는 deprecated로 간주됩니다.

GET과 DEL flags
requestflag현재 사용
GET`NLM_F_ROOT | NLM_F_MATCH`둘을 합친 `NLM_F_DUMP`만 사용
GET`NLM_F_ATOMIC`사용하지 않음
DEL`NLM_F_NONREC`nftables만 사용
DEL`NLM_F_BULK`일부 FDB operation만 사용

대부분 조합으로만 쓰이거나 극히 제한된 subsystem에서 사용합니다.

`NEW` flags의 의미는 family마다 다소 어긋나 명확하지 않습니다. 원문의 의도 설명에서 `NLM_F_REPLACE`는 일치 객체가 있을 때 교체하고 없으면 실패하며, `NLM_F_EXCL`은 반대 의미라고 기술합니다. 이어지는 uAPI 주석은 `CREATE|EXCL`을 ADD, `REPLACE`를 CHANGE, `CREATE|REPLACE`를 true CHANGE, `CREATE`를 append, `EXCL`을 check로 대응시킵니다. 원문 내부 설명과 실제 family별 동작의 차이는 해당 uAPI 구현을 기준으로 검토해야 합니다.

NEW flag 조합의 역사적 주석
동작flags
4.4BSD ADD`NLM_F_CREATE | NLM_F_EXCL`
4.4BSD CHANGE`NLM_F_REPLACE`
True CHANGE`NLM_F_CREATE | NLM_F_REPLACE`
Append`NLM_F_CREATE`
Check`NLM_F_EXCL`

main Netlink uAPI header에 기록된 4.4BSD 계열 의미입니다.

이 flags는 request type보다 먼저 생긴 것으로 보입니다. `CREATE` 없는 `REPLACE`는 처음에 `SET` 대신 쓰였고, `CREATE` 없는 `EXCL`은 `GET` 이전에 객체 존재를 검사하는 데 쓰였습니다. `NLM_F_APPEND`는 한 key에 route의 여러 next-hop처럼 여러 객체가 연결될 때 전체 목록을 교체하지 않고 새 객체를 목록 끝에 추가하도록 합니다.

Notification echo
-----------------

``NLM_F_ECHO`` requests for notifications resulting from the request
to be queued onto the requesting socket. This is useful to discover
the impact of the request.

Note that this feature is not universally implemented.

Other request-type-specific flags
---------------------------------

Classic Netlink defined various flags for its ``GET``, ``NEW``
and ``DEL`` requests in the upper byte of nlmsg_flags in struct nlmsghdr.
Since request types have not been generalized the request type specific
flags are rarely used (and considered deprecated for new families).

For ``GET`` - ``NLM_F_ROOT`` and ``NLM_F_MATCH`` are combined into
``NLM_F_DUMP``, and not used separately. ``NLM_F_ATOMIC`` is never used.

For ``DEL`` - ``NLM_F_NONREC`` is only used by nftables and ``NLM_F_BULK``
only by FDB some operations.

The flags for ``NEW`` are used most commonly in classic Netlink. Unfortunately,
the meaning is not crystal clear. The following description is based on the
best guess of the intention of the authors, and in practice all families
stray from it in one way or another. ``NLM_F_REPLACE`` asks to replace
an existing object, if no matching object exists the operation should fail.
``NLM_F_EXCL`` has the opposite semantics and only succeeds if object already
existed.
``NLM_F_CREATE`` asks for the object to be created if it does not
exist, it can be combined with ``NLM_F_REPLACE`` and ``NLM_F_EXCL``.

A comment in the main Netlink uAPI header states::

   4.4BSD ADD		NLM_F_CREATE|NLM_F_EXCL
   4.4BSD CHANGE	NLM_F_REPLACE

   True CHANGE		NLM_F_CREATE|NLM_F_REPLACE
   Append		NLM_F_CREATE
   Check		NLM_F_EXCL

which seems to indicate that those flags predate request types.
``NLM_F_REPLACE`` without ``NLM_F_CREATE`` was initially used instead
of ``SET`` commands.
``NLM_F_EXCL`` without ``NLM_F_CREATE`` was used to check if object exists
without creating it, presumably predating ``GET`` commands.

``NLM_F_APPEND`` indicates that if one key can have multiple objects associated
with it (e.g. multiple next-hop objects for a route) the new object should be
added to the list rather than replacing the entire list.